So far my blog has looked at various definitions and
processes associated with cultural geography. I now want to slightly switch the
focus of my blog and begin to explore how cultural items such as art work and
literature can be used to not only understand geographical processes, but to appreciate
past and present cultures themselves. In order to illustrate this point I have
chosen to look at the collapse of the Mayan Civilisation.
So who exactly were
the Mayans?
The Mayans created a civilisation in Mesoamerica, which was
a large region that we now refer to as Mexico, Honduras and Guatemala. The
ancestors of the Mayans had previously led a hunter-gatherer lifestyle, but by
around 2000BC the civilisation had adopted agriculture as a way of life and
heavy relied on it for their existence. Many
studies of Mayan society demonstrate its apparent complexity - particularly after
250AD where there is a marked rapid growth of a complex, stratified and prolific
empire referred to as the ‘Classic Mayan Empire’. Their complexity is demonstrated
by the development of trade networks that spanned Mesoamerica, expansive urban centres,
the erection of intricate monumental stelae and strong advances in astronomy, mathematics
and a written language. Yet, despite
this, the Classic Mayan Empire seems to suddenly collapse at the peak of their
cultural development between 750 and 900 A.D.
More information on the Mayans can be found at the following
websites:
So why did their
civilisation collapse?
There
are two ways of looking at what might explain the collapse of the Classic Mayan
Society. The first would be to analyse geographical data from the time. Many
reasons for the collapse have been suggested, including overpopulation,
deforestation, soil erosion, warfare and disease. However the most unambiguous
evidence for their demise comes in the form of climate change. For instance, many
sediment cores taken from lakes such as Lake Punta and the Cariaco Basin
indicate distinctly dry periods that coincide with the collapse of the Mayan
people. As a result, from the use of this first method of analysis, a broad consensus
can be made that the presence of an abrupt shift in climate to more arid conditions
was somehow responsible for the demise of the Mayan Civilisation (DeMenocal,
2001; Weiss and Bradley, 2001; Hodell, 2007).
Whilst the first method of analysis has proven to be fairly
conclusive, it is the second method that in my opinion gives a much more detailed
account and therefore clearer depiction of what may have happened. The second
method involves looking at existing cultural items from the time to build up a
stronger picture of what society and daily life was really like. For example, archaeological
remains, paintings and pottery all indicate the presence of a society that was
highly reliant on agriculture. This was an agriculture that not only produced
high yields of cereal but one that was heavily reliant on the use of a highly
sophisticated irrigation system. Therefore the picture of the droughts now
seems to make more sense in that if there was less rainfall, the crop harvests
would have undoubtedly failed and the Mayan peoples starved, having devastating consequences.
The websites above give
a more detailed approach towards Mayan art and artefacts. Below is a series of
items that show the high reliance on agriculture and irrigation in Mayan
society:
Overall, I think that by looking at the case of the Mayans
it has made me realise that when teaching geography itself it is not only important to
explore the topic of culture, but it is equally important to realise that cultural
items such as art, literature and archaeology can also reinforce knowledge of
geographical processes and events. I will look at this interrelationship further
in my next blog that discusses The Little Ice Age and suggests a good activity in the classroom to exemplify this point to students.
Below are the references of journal papers that I looked at
to discover explanations of why the Mayan Civilisation collapsed, there are
many more in this field that can easily be found online:
DeMenocal. P., 200. Cultural responses to climate change during
the Holocene. SCIENCE. Volume: 292: Pages: 667-673.
Hodell. D., 2007. Climate and cultural history of the north-eastern
Yucatan Peninsula, Quintana Roo, Mexico. CLIMATE CHANGE. Volume: 83. Pages
215-240.
Weiss and Bradley., 2001. What drives societal collapse?
SCIENCE. Volume: 291. Pages 609-610.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment